<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Energy In Depth &#187; groundwater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.energyindepth.org/tag/groundwater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.energyindepth.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:08:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking: U.S. EPA Declares Dimock Water Safe; &#8220;Does Not Present &#8230; Health Threat to Users&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.energyindepth.org/breaking-u-s-epa-declares-dimock-water-has-no-health-impacts/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=breaking-u-s-epa-declares-dimock-water-has-no-health-impacts</link>
		<comments>http://www.energyindepth.org/breaking-u-s-epa-declares-dimock-water-has-no-health-impacts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cabot Oil and Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dimock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. EPA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyindepth.org/?p=1866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those not aware, the town of Dimock, Pennsylvania has become a proverbial lightning rod in the ongoing efforts of... <a href="http://www.energyindepth.org/breaking-u-s-epa-declares-dimock-water-has-no-health-impacts/">Keep Reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those not aware, the town of Dimock, Pennsylvania has become a proverbial lightning rod in the ongoing efforts of some to disparage natural gas production at every turn.  Featured in Gasland, and just about every other anti-natural gas development effort, the story some would have you believe is that the water there was &#8220;ruined&#8221; and is not safe to drink. </p>
<p>Well, if water tests from the producer and the PA DEP weren&#8217;t evidence enough, now the EPA has gotten involved, essentially confirming earlier findings that contested water wells in the area pose no threat to human health.  Our team at<a href="http://eidmarcellus.org/"> EID-Northeast Marcellus Initiative</a> recieved an  <a href="http://eidmarcellus.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/EPA-message.pdf">email from some our friends in Dimock</a> that was sent to them by EPA Region 3 Community Involvement Coordinator Trish Taylor.  The email indicates that EPA’s review has found the water in Dimock does not pose a threat to human health. Text of this correspondence is below.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Dear Dimock Residents,</em></p>
<p><em>This email is a follow-up to the visits to Dimock area homes by EPA on November 10, 2011 and the subsequent review of well sampling data for wells impacted by the Cabot Oil and Gas Company drilling activities.   EPA has conducted a preliminary review and screening of the data provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection and residents.  While we are continuing our review, to date, the data does not indicate that the well water presents an immediate health threat to users.   EPA will continue to review available information related to the concerns of Dimock area residents.  We are continuing to work with the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania going forward on this issue.</em></p>
<p><em>Please feel free to call me or David Polish, Community Involvement Coordinator, at (215) 814-3327, if you have further questions.</em></p>
<p><em>Sincerely,</em></p>
<p><em>Trish Taylor, Community Involvement Coordinator</em></p>
<p><em>Hazardous Site Cleanup Division (Mailcode 3HS52)</em></p>
<p><em>U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 3</em></p>
<p><em>1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA., 19103</em></p>
<p><em>phone: (215) 814 – 5539</em></p>
<p><em>fax: (215) 814 – 3015</em></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energyindepth.org/breaking-u-s-epa-declares-dimock-water-has-no-health-impacts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USGS Study Finds Groundwater Contamination Due to Natural Phenomena</title>
		<link>http://www.energyindepth.org/usgs-study-finds-groundwater-contamination-due-to-natural-phenomena/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=usgs-study-finds-groundwater-contamination-due-to-natural-phenomena</link>
		<comments>http://www.energyindepth.org/usgs-study-finds-groundwater-contamination-due-to-natural-phenomena/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geological Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trace elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USGS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.energyindepth.org/?p=2447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nationwide examination finds high levels of trace elements in public and private water supplies, links occurrence to natural conditions. Critics of natural gas... <a href="http://www.energyindepth.org/usgs-study-finds-groundwater-contamination-due-to-natural-phenomena/">Keep Reading &#187;</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Nationwide examination finds high levels of trace elements in public and private water supplies, links occurrence to natural conditions.</em></p>
<p>Critics of natural gas exploration frequently assert that natural gas production &#8212; and hydraulic fracturing in particular &#8212; contaminates private drinking water supplies. Countless times they have declared, through correlative assertions and without any meaningful investigation, that hydraulic fracturing is to blame for a wide range of contaminants discovered in wells or aquifers throughout the country.</p>
<p>But a decade’s long study from the <a href="http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/trace/pubs/sir2011-5059/">U.S. Geological Survey</a>, utilizing over 5,000 samples from public and private wells, turns this idea on its head. Specifically, the USGS’s National Water-Quality Assessment Program &#8212; the nation’s preeminent unbiased water research program &#8212; finds that about one in five (20%) water wells across the country have at least one trace element of contaminants at a level that poses a risk to human health.</p>
<p>The study found widespread, natural occurrences of many contaminants that drilling opponents often (erroneously) link to natural gas operations.  The researchers found that naturally-occurring levels of arsenic, manganese, and uranium were the trace elements in groundwater that most frequently exceeded Environmental Protection Agency human health benchmarks.  Of the wells surveyed, high levels of arsenic were discovered in 7%, manganese in 12%, and uranium in over 4%. Side effects of over-exposure to manganese can include tremors and postural instability, symptoms many critics often wrongly attribute to nearby gas drilling.</p>
<p>The USGS also discovered a very high frequency of radon (Rn) gas, which is produced by the decay of naturally-occurring uranium. From the <a href="http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/trace/pubs/sir2011-5059/">report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rn occurred at concentrations greater than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) proposed maximum contaminant level of 300 pCi/L in <strong>more than 65 percent of water samples</strong>, and concentrations of Rn in 2.7 percent of samples were greater than the USEPA-proposed alternate maximum contaminant level of 4,000 pCi/L.</p></blockquote>
<p>Most of these contaminants, according to USGS, <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">&#8220;get into the water through the natural process of rock weathering.&#8221;</span></strong> This is an important conclusion, as the most acute areas of contamination were found in rural areas not served by public drinking water systems. These are also the areas where a significant amount of natural gas drilling occurs.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Trace elements could be present in water from private wells that are considered to pose a risk to human health, because they aren’t subject to regulations. In many cases people might not even know they have an issue.&#8221;</em> – Joe Ayotte, USGS Hydrologist and Lead Author</p></blockquote>
<p>Put differently, people could be drinking and using contaminated water for years, but once a natural gas company begins production in the area, activists begin demanding water tests to check for contamination. If any is found, the link is made between drilling and water pollution. This USGS report shows, however, that such a link may be speculative at best.</p>
<p>The issue of water well contamination has been contentious in recent years with outlets like the <em>New York Times</em> jumping headlong into specious accusations about natural gas production being linked, for example, to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/27/us/27gas.html?_r=1">radioactive drinking water</a>. Of course, testing by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the state’s largest drinking water utility showed these claims to be unsupported by the facts, a conclusion reinforced by this most recent USGS study, which suggests nature, not natural gas drilling, is actually the major culprit in water contamination across the country.</p>
<p>The USGS does note that human activities can be contributing factors to water contamination. Still, the fact that many of the wells tested contained high levels of these trace elements without any nearby gas production suggests drawing a causal connection between drilling and water contamination could be based more on preconceived notions than on any legitimate, scientific assessment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.energyindepth.org/usgs-study-finds-groundwater-contamination-due-to-natural-phenomena/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

