A widely-covered study that claimed ExxonMobil misled the public on climate change is fatally flawed, according to a bombshell rebuttal published today by one of the foremost experts in content analysis. The original study, authored by Harvard University’s Geoffrey Supran and Naomi Oreskes, relies on data analysis that is “unreliable, invalid, biased, not generalizable, and not replicable,” according to the expert, whose methods were cited by Supran and Oreskes.

Continue reading at EID Climate.