California

California Gov. Jerry Brown Rejects Activists’ ‘Ideological Bandwagon’

For several months now, ideologically motivated environmental activists have been waging a scare campaign in California aimed at pressuring state lawmakers and Gov. Jerry Brown to ban hydraulic fracturing. The activists are targeting this technology because it could be used to produce oil from California’s Monterey Shale, which according to a new study from the University of Southern California, could create as many as 2.8 million jobs and generate almost $25 billion in new annual tax revenues by the end of the decade.

So is the fear campaign working? Not on Gov. Brown, apparently. Here’s how Reuters covered some remarks from Gov. Brown at a March 13 press conference:

California governor Brown says state needs to look at “fracking”

California Governor Jerry Brown, a prominent environmentalist, said on Wednesday the state should consider the use of “fracking” technology to develop its massive shale oil reserves and reduce reliance on imported oil. …

“We want to get the greenhouse gas emissions down, but we also want to keep our economy going. That’s that balance that’s required,” he said at an event to announce the approval of three new renewable energy projects. …

Some groups have called for an outright ban on the practice in California, and state lawmakers have introduced a flurry of bills that seek to regulate the industry.

Brown said any decisions on fracking would be based on science and common sense, and on a process that “listens to people but also wants to take advantage of the great opportunities we have.”

“The fossil fuel deposits in California are incredible, the potential is extraordinary,” he said. “But between now and development lies a lot of questions that need to be answered.”

But when you listen to the State of California’s recording of the press conference, the news is much worse for the activists, and much better for those interested in a rational, fact-based discussion about the role of domestic oil and gas production in meeting the nation’s future energy needs.

(The full press conference can be accessed here, and a shorter, edited audio clip of Gov. Brown’s remarks on hydraulic fracturing can found here.)

Gov. Brown first got a question about his position on hydraulic fracturing in California and whether he supports “new regulations on that practice.” California’s Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources has proposed updated rules that would allow the continued use of hydraulic fracturing, but with tougher oversight and disclosure requirements. Here’s Gov. Brown’s answer:

I support our Division of Oil and Gas. They are excellent people and I look for them to navigate the issues as we go forward. The fossil fuel deposits in California are incredible. The potential is extraordinary. But between now and development lies a lot of questions that need to be answered, and I feel confident that the people are in place in my administration to handle the issues as they come up. And they’ll be decided based on science, based on common sense, and based on a deliberative process that listens to people, but also wants to take advantage of the great opportunities we have in this state.”

Later, Brown was asked by a reporter to “reconcile your desire to fight climate change [and] your enthusiasm for renewable energy with what seems to be support for fracking in California and an expansion of it.” The reporter noted that some people who voted for Brown “would like to see an outright ban on fracking in California.” Here’s an edited transcript of Brown’s answer:

“Do you know how much oil is imported to keep our cars going? … [When people in California] can get around without using any gasoline, that’s the time for no more oil drilling. Maybe. Because they’ll be many other people still driving. We’re importing oil from many places. It means you’ve got to bring it in by ship or by truck or by pipeline – by something.

So taking care of our own problems is a good thing. So if we need to have everybody driving around, as we do … we’ve got to get some oil. Now, do you want to get the oil from Venezuela [or from] 100 miles away?  …  By the way, oil off the City of Long Beach has put hundreds of millions of dollars into building necessary facilities at our Cal State University. Very important. In the Kern Basin, lots of oil resource. So we want to get the greenhouse gas emissions down, but we also want to keep our economy going. And that’s that balance that’s required. …

We have 30 million vehicles in California. That’s a lot of oil. So I think we have room to supply our need even as we reduce oil consumption. We should be reducing it much faster than we are, and hopefully we can get some national policies to do that, but that still doesn’t mean that in the meantime there isn’t oil under the ground in California that can’t be made very useful.”

In his closing remarks, Brown mentioned hydraulic fracturing once more in a broader answer about energy and environmental issues:

“Whether it’s fracking, or whether it’s a low-carbon fuel standard, or anything else, we keep our eyes open and we’re not jumping on any ideological bandwagons.”

When someone with Governor Brown’s long record on renewable energy and environmental regulation speaks favorably about domestic oil and gas production, it shows just how extreme the anti-hydraulic fracturing activists really are. These activists occupy the fringes of the energy policy debate in this country, and to answer Gov. Brown’s question, they really would prefer that we get more oil from countries like Venezuela.

9 Comments
  • Marcellus & Utica Shale Story Links: Mon, Mar 18, 2013 | Marcellus Drilling News
    Posted at 11:27 am, March 18, 2013 Reply

    […] California Gov. Jerry Brown Rejects Activists’ ‘Ideological Bandwagon’ Energy in Depth California Governor Jerry Brown, a prominent environmentalist, said on Wednesday the state should consider the use of “fracking” technology to develop its massive shale oil reserves and reduce reliance on imported oil. […]

  • Jerry Brown, a champion of oil and the Monterey Shale? « The Barrel Blog
    Posted at 8:40 pm, March 24, 2013 Reply

    […] California Governor Jerry Brown made a few remarks recently about the state’s oil and gas prospects that sounded so positive to one industry group that it featured them on its homepage. […]

  • Russ Miller
    Posted at 10:03 am, March 27, 2013 Reply

    Kudos to Gov. Brown talk to Gov. Cuomo get him on the correct path…

  • 'Climate Warrior' Jeff Immelt Corrects Activists on Gas and Renewables « InventivEnergy
    Posted at 1:58 pm, November 05, 2013 Reply

    […] the oil and gas industry throughout his four decades in politics, specifically rejected the “ideological bandwagons” of the activists, and so did thevast majority of lawmakers in the state legislature. This […]

  • Why Anti Fracking Activists Really Hated Obama’s SOTU Speech « Breaking Energy - Energy industry news, analysis, and commentary
    Posted at 11:11 am, January 31, 2014 Reply

    […] who has repeatedly clashed with the oil and gas industry throughout his long political career, rejected “ideological bandwagons” when state lawmakers and regulators were updating hydraulic fracturing […]

  • dock tool box organizers
    Posted at 1:35 am, September 09, 2014 Reply

    Essential is a good set of insulated waders as well as a hooded, waterproof coat to wear over your clothing and waders.

    For instance at a time when anglers where sticking rigidly
    to the mantra of 3 to 5 milliliters of flavour, plus 1 to 2 milliliters of intense sweetener to a pound of base
    mix or more, as measured by 4 large eggs or 6 medium eggs as
    a basis of measurement, I tried other approaches and reaped big
    rewards against much more experienced anglers.
    You can then take your armored vehicle and cash it in at a chop shop, creating a nice little criminal spree combo.

  • Food & Water Watch Reboots Fringe Campaign for Colorado Energy Ban | Latest Oil and Gas Jobs
    Posted at 6:14 pm, February 24, 2015 Reply

    […] California Jerry Brown (D) stood by the state’s experts in geology and engineering and called for a decision-making process “based on science and common sense” and free of […]

  • Technical Diagnostic
    Posted at 4:08 pm, May 01, 2015 Reply

    What most people fail to realize is that fracking is not just used to extract oil and gas. It is also used to stimulate production from water wells.

    The most surprising fact for me at least, is that besides the sand and water which is the majority of what is used for fracking, another component of the mixture is guar gum which is also found in ice creams…

    Opponents of fracking will no doubt ignore lesser-known facts about the process to support their views, but there is always two sides to a coin.

  • Sieglinde Kinne
    Posted at 11:22 am, February 01, 2016 Reply

    Thanks for your coverage of this. I am still concerned about what Water Defense found in Cawelo Water District area because I haven’t been able to find any published test results based on the new and broader third party testing methods that were reportedly getting put in place last year. Can you help with this?

Post A Comment