Mansfield vs. Mansfield, and Shale Gas Wins

Anne Carto – Coalitions Director, EID Ohio
Nicole Jacobs – Deputy Campaign Director, EID Marcellus
The shale gas plays occurring in Ohio and Pennsylvania have a few differences, the most obvious being the oil and wet gas rich Utica Shale versus the largely dry gas of the Marcellus. Both also present potentially huge opportunities for economic development, job creation and energy independence for our nation. Accordingly, one would expect Mansfield, Ohio (county seat of Richland County, which had a population of 124,475 in 2010) and Mansfield, Pennsylvania (located in Tioga County, which had a population of 41,981 in 2010) to make for almost mirror images of each other, yet as we sat down together awhile back, we realized there was a world of difference in more than just the makeup of natural resources below our feet.
Mansfield, Ohio, is obviously the big sister in the relationship, given the size of the counties, so one might naturally expect it to demonstrate more horsepower, but if that’s correct they must be using the Old Gray Mare. Two communities with the same name and similar opportunities, couldn’t be experiencing a more different reality. So why is it that Mansfield, Pennsylvania is thriving while Mansfield, Ohio is struggling to keep businesses open? Read on to see a comparison of these two communities.
Anne Looks at Mansfield, OH’s Media Biases Against Oil and Shale Gas Development
With articles and letters to the editor reading “Mansfield residents oppose fracking”, “Increase in fracking raises concerns”, and “Find out real dangers of fracking, and do something”, it doesn’t seem like there is much of a conversation about shale development happening in Mansfield, Ohio. The town I’ve called home my entire life has been plagued with unemployment and disappointment since manufacturing left.
Mansfield was once a vital part of the Midwest’s manufacturing renaissance. Companies including Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Tappan Stove Company, Mansfield Tire & Rubber Company, and Ohio Brass Company, started by my Great Great Uncle, all made Mansfield their home. Like most cities in the Rustbelt, these companies left. Some did survive for a while, including General Motors.
Many family friends worked for GM, until it filed Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2009 and left Mansfield in 2010. Manufacturing is no longer the largest employer, however. No, today, Mansfield’s largest employer is the hospital. The loss of those manufacturing jobs resulted, in turn, in many smaller businesses having to shut down. Downtown Mansfield and that part of the city previously known as the “Miracle Mile” might well now be described as “the miracle that was.”
One would think a town in desperate need of economic revitalization would embrace, or at least talk about, an industry poised to bring economic opportunities to families around the community. Instead, the local paper has taken a biased tone and has seemingly chosen to focus its efforts on rumors regarding shale development and the oil and gas industry.
Multiple letters have warned residents of water contamination because of hydraulic fracturing, but we have disproved that time and time again. Yet, these claims keeps popping back up faster than prairie dogs sounding the alarm about intruders. Isn’t this what’s all about, really, for the opposition – fighting change, fighting supposed intruders who might actually help bring Mansfield back? Letters claim there is not enough or no regulation on the oil and gas industries, but as we’ve covered before that’s blatantly untrue. Some letters complain shale development won’t actually help Americans with their energy needs, but we’ve already seen a boost in manufacturing , $250 billion in savings for utility customers nationwide, and a world-leading reduction in carbon dioxide emissions because of shale development.
However, despite all of this, even the Mayor of Mansfield has turned his back on am industry already bringing opportunity to eastern Ohio. He seems to have it out for development and is supporting the City Council’s efforts to give city officials the power to vote down future development.
This is very similar to what our EID Marcellus team has seen occur in Binghamton, New York. There a lame-duck City Council, at their last meeting of 2011, and last meeting ever for five of the seven members, voted to approve a natural gas moratorium. Local businesses like the Holiday Inn, which are thriving, thanks to Marcellus Shale development over the border, spoke at a recent meeting to urge the city to reject the ill-fated moratorium that will stymy local businesses.
Instead, the council followed the very anti-shale gas agenda of Mayor Matt Ryan and now faces a lawsuit from several local organizations and businesses.
“The legal wrangling will center on whether or not the city’s ban was a land use law or a police action meant to protect the city’s drinking water supply. Ryan and company will have to prove the ban was a police action and not a land use law—a very dicey proposition and not one that’s likely to hold up in court. Meanwhile, the legal bills will start piling up for city taxpayers. Thanks Matt!” (Marcellus Drilling News, May 31, 2012)
A lawsuit or putting up a “closed for business sign” is not something our city can afford to do. We’re already struggling. With an unemployment rate of 7.9%, higher than the state of Ohio, it is imperative the tone changes and changes quickly in Mansfield. I want to see the city where I grew up flourish once again, especially when I look to Mansfield, Pennsylvania and see such progress there.
Nicole Delves Into Mansfield, PA’s Economic Revitalization Thanks to Marcellus Shale
Unlike Anne, I didn’t grow up in Mansfield, but just down the road in Williamsport, and I have quite a few family members who still call Tioga County home. It’s always been one of my favorite places to visit. I remember my grandmother taking me on the Tioga Central Railroad and we would always stop at the Pennsylvania Grand Canyon on our way home from visiting family in Galeton.
When I looked at colleges in 2003-04, Mansfield University was high on my list of schools to visit. One of the things I remember vividly was the lack of things to do in town. When I visit now, I’m happy to see a lot has changed in the almost 10 years since I considered moving there. According to the Mansfield Chamber of Commerce, this, is in large part, due to the increased opportunities created by the Marcellus Shale, which collectively has replaced Mansfield University and the Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education (PASSHE) as the largest employer:
“The most predominant industry in the area today is the Marcellus Shale.”
This is precisely the opposite of what’s happening in Mansfield, Ohio, where institutional uses have become the largest employers by unfortunate default.
Just a quick glance through the Chamber’s member companies shows just how big of an impact Marcellus development is having on the business community in Mansfield, Pa. Members like Allison Crane and Rigging, Talisman Energy, and Ward Manufacturing, just to name a few, all work in some capacity in the natural gas industry.
The economic development and new businesses that have moved into this quaint, little college town are highlighted in this video by Energy Tomorrow.
Since Marcellus Shale became a household name, Mansfield University is even making changes to keep up with the growing demand for natural gas related jobs the industry is bringing. The newly created Marcellus Institute of Mansfield University recently received approval from PASSHE for two new degree programs; the Associate of Applied Science in Natural Gas Production and Services and the Bachelor of Science in Safety Management.
“We are very grateful to the Board of Governors for their support of our program initiatives as evidenced by their approval of two new academic programs,” MU Interim President Allan Golden said. “These programs will enable Mansfield University to help meet the workforce development needs of our region while expanding career opportunities for our students.”
“Mansfield University is a public liberal arts institution,” Golden said. “We’re in the heart of Marcellus Shale, and that puts us in the unique position to continue to fulfill our mission, serving not only our area but the entire Commonwealth.”
Take a look at the following video from the Marcellus Institute and their partners the Marcellus Shale Coalition, the Pennsylvania Independent Oil and Gas Association, PASSHE, the Northern Tier Regional Planning and Development Commission and the Southern Tioga School District.
http://youtu.be/tkPzXCceVaM
Alternate Realities
The differences between these two areas, only a state apart, should’nt be so extreme. Given the recent increase in development in Ohio, its Mansfield should not only be on par with Pennsylvania’s, but potentially even surpass it in economic development and growth. It should be right up there with Williamsport, Pennsylvania as one of the fastest growing cities in the country or Canton, Ohio which is quickly becoming the Utica Shale capitol.
Instead, we see businesses opening in Mansfield, Pennsylvania while they’re slamming their doors shut in Ohio. Take a look at this chart for a visual breakdown of these differences as reflected in employment patterns. See a trend? Can you hear us now, Mansfield, Ohio?
Mansfield, Ohio has a long way to go before it can reclaim the splendor it once had and join other businesses in rebuilding the Rust Belt. The first step is to sort through all of the misinformation circulating in the media and really start discussing a plan for improving the city, one that includes the oil and gas industry.
Perhaps it’s time Mansfield, Ohio starts looking across the border at Mansfield, Pennsylvania and the improvements there as a goal for the future.

Donald L Crusan
Posted at 09:37h, 12 JulyAnne & Nicole,
As an old grey bearded dinosaur, I have found during my years of travel on behalf of clients in this businees, that everytime a region grows their low paying service jobs captive to higher education, medical services (including hospitals0, and the tourism industry, they fall into stagnant non growth patterns and possible near bankruptcy scenarios..
I responded to this artticle on Tom Shepsone’s post on LinkedIn and I would like to share it with all of your readers!
http://www.linkedin.com/groupAnswers?viewQuestionAndAnswers=&discussionID=133314938&gid=1687797&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn&ut=26bURkZP19k5k1
As my very wise and progressive Amish friends always told me; too much ‘higher education’ does a person no good.
bdub
Posted at 16:28h, 12 Julywe cannot afford to lose this much water. agriculture is ohio’s number one resource: let them have half of the subsidies that oil is getting now. the process leaves perforations that “alien” gasses can coem up through. look at the duke study 2012 that proves that thiese chemicals such as benzene and radon DO get into the aquafers. stop fracking. i adore mansfield!
Nicole Jacobs
Posted at 12:23h, 13 JulyActually when put in perspective this development uses far less water than other industries. Further, the combustion of methane adds more water to the hydrological cycle than it uses: http://eidmarcellus.org/marcellus-shale/turning-natural-gas-into-water-hydraulic-fracturing-doesnt-deplete-water-supplies/7713/
And we have looked at the Duke study, pretty thoroughly: http://eidmarcellus.org/marcellus-shale/another-duke-rebuke/10832/
Dr Scott Cline
Posted at 19:46h, 13 JulyBdub:
Don’t you understand that natural gas combustion increases the amount of water to the hydrologic cycle? This is high school chemistry level knowledge. Go back to school and learn something before you speak.
Even though a typical Marcellus well may use 5 million gallons and return only 4 million, the combustion of only a 1 BCF well returns over 10 million gallons. With Marcellus wells averaging 4 BCF, we return 40+ million gallons per well or over four times the amount consumed.
Do your homework so you don’t embarrass yourself.
http://eidmarcellus.org/marcellus-shale/turning-natural-gas-into-water-hydraulic-fracturing-doesnt-deplete-water-supplies/7713/
Dr. Scott Cline, PhD petroleum engineering
Stanley, NY
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 19:45h, 12 JulySo, you are a paid writer for natural gas developement, you live in Williamsport PA, wanted to move to Mansfield PA , visited it multiple times, and you must have driven through Wellsboro PA when you went for rides on the Tioga Central Railroad (and visited Galeton) and you never noticed that the county courthouse is in Wellsboro… Do you really know anything about Tioga County or are you just writing this drival because you are paid to by the gas industry? Again, you live in Williamsport so I guess you don’t know what it’s like to have one of these well pads in your back yard. Forget the fracking, do you really want one of these 16 acre well pads in your back yard and have Shell use it as a staging area with hundreds of trucks a day driving in and out of the pad to frack wells 5 miles away. Really, would you like this?
Nicole Jacobs
Posted at 12:27h, 13 JulyI have a lot of family living in Tioga County and am very familiar with it. Further, I am originally from Williamsport, but have spent the last few years since college residing in Hughesville (Penn Township) surrounded by natural gas development. So no I am not just a paid writer for the industry. I am a landowner receiving no royalties that sees the benefits of this industry which led me to seek out employment in it. Do you deny Mansfield has seen increased economic development from natural gas development? Am I wrong that MU is adding programs to help train the local workforce?
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 16:40h, 13 JulySo, you’re surrounded by the gas pads? How close is the nearest one? 200 yards? How about 75 yards? Do you have one that close? Do you deny that maybe, just maybe there is enough land in Tioga County that these pads don’t have to be built so close to houses? Why are they built in back (and front) yards? They can’t be afraid of the dark can they?
I already know you’ll deny that Marcellus drilling causes any pollution, your headlines tell that story. Hmm, there is a pad 1 mile from my house that polluted the neighbors water so completely that they had to move out and Shell bought the property…
So yeah, economic development, but at what cost?
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 20:45h, 13 JulyYou’re correct in one respect – there is no case of hydraulic fracturing polluting a water supply. There have been some methane migration issues but there are typically fixable and very limited in number.
Nicole Jacobs
Posted at 12:54h, 14 JulyBryan, I have wells less than a mile away too. There are 2 pads each within a mile of my house, the nearest being about 3/4 of a mile as the crow flies, and far more if you go out further. We only own 2 acres so no I won’t have a well pad directly on my property and we’re not in any unit. I started doing research because of a surface spill that temporarily impacted our water well and a neighbor’s in November 2010, so I absolutely acknowledge surface spills and methane migration can occur. I came to my own conclusions through observation and research that this can be done safely and the benefits far outweigh the risks.
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 07:39h, 02 August“Bryan, I have wells less than a mile away too. There are 2 pads each within a mile of my house, the nearest being about 3/4 of a mile as the crow flies, and far more if you go out further. We only own 2 acres so no I won’t have a well pad directly on my property and we’re not in any unit. I started doing research because of a surface spill that temporarily impacted our water well and a neighbor’s in November 2010, so I absolutely acknowledge surface spills and methane migration can occur. I came to my own conclusions through observation and research that this can be done safely and the benefits far outweigh the risks.”
Nicole,
I’m not talking about 3/4’s of a mile. I’m talking about well pads 3/4’s of 100 yards! Would you be in favor of having one that close to your house?
Matthew Strange
Posted at 13:00h, 13 JulyBryan, shouldn’t you, in the interest of full disclosure, note that you work for a competing industry?
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 16:27h, 13 JulySorry Matt, electric distribution utilities are not competing with the gas industry. Not even close.
Matthew Strange
Posted at 18:37h, 13 JulyI would disagree: The more natural gas succeeds, the less demand there is for electricity, which would certainly have an impact on related industries, such as yours.
Or are you suggesting that if every household in the county converted from electric to natural gas, Penelec, et. al. would not lose a single dollar of income? I find it difficult to understand how that can be.
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 22:19h, 13 JulyMy displeasure with the gas industry has nothing to do with “gas vs. electric”. You are creating an argument based on where I work and nothing I’ve said.
Try running your Macs on natural gas. What? Can’t do it? Let me know when you can and then I’ll admit this is gas vs. electric.
If your argument held any water at all, I’d be selling all the indirect electric water heaters I could. I never have recommended one nor will I. I’m not against gas. People like you and the author haven’t been directly impacted a gas pad. At least, I haven’t seen a pad in your back yard.
All you see is more traffic and more people. I see a 16 acre area of destruction. I see property that was destroyed because the gas company wanting their well pad where they wanted, not where the owner wanted it. I see a lease with an clause that said “Lessor reserves the right to approve the location of any pipelines, access roads and well pads” and a well pad and access road exactly where she didn’t want it. I see a tax bill for 16 acres that can no longer be used by the land owner. I see and drive on a road that was destroyed by water trucks.
If you really want to see the gas industry and the desctruction they’ve caused, get in your car, drive out of Mansfield and take some road off Rt 6. All you see on 6 is the new businesses you’re all so proud of. When you get off 6, you’ll start to see the destruction I’m talking about. Talk to somebody who had their 2 acre slice of heaven on a dirt road only to have multiple well pads or water containment ponds built past them. I bet you’ll find that they don’t work for an electric company and they like the industry as much as I do.
Matthew Strange
Posted at 14:38h, 24 July“Try running your Macs on natural gas. What? Can’t do it? Let me know when you can and then I’ll admit this is gas vs. electric.”
Well… my natural gas generator supplies 220v AC power to my entire house. (Yes, we only use it when Penelec fails us, but we’ve seriously discussed flipping it over and using gas as our primary source.)
As for “somebody who had their 2 acre slice of heaven on a dirt road…” — that’s a valid point. But that’s completely separate from the issue of economic development. The same argument could be made about building a shopping mall (or maybe a Lowe’s!), as there would be somebody who wouldn’t be happy because it disrupted their comfortable lifestyle.
But for every family you can line up to complain about water trucks rolling down a dirt road, there’s another who is able to remodel their house because of the economic boom gas has brought to the area.
There are certainly pros and cons to any economic development. As one whose ‘family locus’ is in the Mainesburg area, I would argue that the natural gas ‘footprint’ is much preferable to the wind towers blighting the scenery. You suggest my position is invalid because I don’t have “a pad in my back yard.” But for both Susan and I, our family roots are in Mainesburg area. There are gas wells and wind turbines on (or in the sight lines of) family properties. But both are accepted, despite the annoyances, because they bring prosperity to the region.
But even if I didn’t agree, I wouldn’t resort to ad homenim attacks such as you used in your opening salvo. Even the people you disagree with are human beings who deserve to be treated with respect. I rarely get involved in online discussions because the tendency is to debase the opponent. But when I saw a name that I could associate with a face, and read what you was saying about other people, it prompted me to respond.
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 07:31h, 02 AugustMatt, I’m sure if we had lunch sometime, you would find out how minor of an “ad homenim” attack my original post was. I’ll leave it at that.
Scott Cline
Posted at 06:51h, 13 JulyGreat article and comparison Anne and Nicole. I used to drive through Mansfield, PA on the old Route 15 on my way home to the Finger Lakes from Penn State quite often back in the late 70s. While it had the university to give it some economic stability it was certainly a depressed region. Now when I drive through that area I see economic vitality, new businesses, new homes being built and I can even sense excitement in the air when I stop for a cup of coffee.
I have since lived and worked in many areas of the country where oil and gas activity is occuring and without exception it has brought propserity and communities have welcomed and appreciated the industry.
Let’s get NY moving!
Bryan Berguson
Posted at 07:54h, 02 AugustNext time you’re driving through town Scott, look me up. I’ll show you the other side of that “excitement”.