U.S. Is the World’s Largest Natural Gas Producer. Why Is New England Still Importing Foreign LNG?
The United States has an abundance of natural gas, particularly in the Appalachian Basin. In fact, as the American Oil and Gas Reporter recently explained:
“Today, Appalachia by itself is outproducing all but two of the nations on the list of the world’s top liquified natural gas exporters in 2021: the United States and Russia. In short, Marcellus and Utica producers are sending more gas to the sales line every day than the entire countries of Australia, Qatar and Malaysia–all of which are among the five largest LNG exporters.” (emphasis added)
Yet despite this, just a few states over in New England, residents are still importing foreign natural gas following a series of policies and political actions over the last several years that have blocked the necessary additional pipeline capacity needed to meet winter demand. As the Interstate Natural Gas Association of America recently tweeted:
Question for @POTUS, @SecGranholm, @Energy and @WHCOS: why is the USA importing #naturalgas into New England when it’s a stone’s throw from Pennsylvania, the 2nd largest natural gas field in the world? We need more pipeline infrastructure. We need permitting reform. https://t.co/jucBeQz2EH
— INGAA (@INGAApipelines) August 31, 2022
Already this year, the Everett LNG import facility in Massachusetts has received four cargo shipments of natural gas and if Energy Sec. Jennifer Granholm’s letters to New England governors last week is any indication of the winter to come, those won’t be the last as cold temperatures return this year. The Secretary urged governors to bolster their energy supplies, writing:
“I urge you to consider what additional steps you can take in the coming weeks to improve preparedness, including using any legislative or executive tools at your disposal, working with responsible state agencies to require increased storage levels, and encouraging industry to voluntarily prioritize increasing gasoline and distillate inventories at this pivotal period of heightened risk.” (emphasis added)
It’s the same conversation year after year, and yet the simplest solution, additional pipeline infrastructure to bring resources from nearby Pennsylvania into the region, remains off the table. It remains to be seen if proposed permitting reform legislation will change that, but for this winter, it appears it will be another “too little, too late” year for New England’s residents who already pay some of the highest costs in the world for energy in winter.
Randy Verret
Posted at 09:40h, 31 AugustOK, so there is an “800 lb. Gorilla” in this energy scenario that everyone refuses to consider. When are responsible citizens, legislators & honest media outlets going to start “calling out” environmental NGO’s? There solution devoid, ideologigal ZEALOTS are the primary reason you can’t permit a pipelien or any other major infrastructure project in the U.S. Their absolute ABUSE of the public review process and Administrative procedures Act in the course of UNENDING litigation has tied the enetire regulatory apparatus into knots. Couple those radical environmentalal NGO’s with activist elements in Federal & State regulatory agencies and “ice the cake” with a vast array of “media enablers” and you can fully understand the morass that has been created. That, and when is someone going to challenge the abuse by New York State of 401 certifications? That has halted at least 3 major pipeline projects over the past 5-10 years that would have (largely) addressed the current natural gas shortage in New England. I’m sick & tired of the Sierra Club, et al getting a “Hall Pass.” Time for an HONEST, well informed & rational debate about a coherent national energy strategy, climate realism & attendant polices…