Marcellus Shale

An Unhealthy Obsession with Fighting Natural Gas

The upstate New York anti-natural gas crowed has run out of options!  They are now going to the district offices of New York State Senate members who support natural gas exploration and advocating still more study, this time of health impacts that are already well known.  While they think such gimmicks will somehow change minds, supporters of natural gas stubbornly stick with the facts.  It’s a tortoise and hare thing, as I see it.  The usual suspects are running around at breakneck speed trying to gin up a story on health impacts that simply do not exist with natural gas development while the pro-natural gas side quietly, but steadily, wins the race by simply telling the true story.

How many times do we have to see my neighbor in the hazmat suit protesting on some sidewalk to know many of these individuals do little else?  How many failed protests by this dwindling band of natural gas malcontents does it take for our leaders to see they represent only the tiniest minority among upstate New Yorkers?  Not many more, I suspect.  The game is up and the unhealthy obsession the other side has with fighting natural gas is wearing thin.

The Dwindling Band

A small group of anti-natural gas activists protested in Binghamton this week outside of Senator Tom Libous’s office. They only had a turnout of about 30 people – the exact same individuals we see everywhere, although my neighbor dropped the yellow suit for blue street clothes this time.  It’s difficult to make a statement when only 30 people show up to protest and they are the same 30 people showing up in other areas across the state.

Small Group of Usual Suspects Protesting at Senator Libous Office

Your News Now (YNN) in Binghamton was there reporting on the protest.  They interviewed some individuals who said they want a public health study before New York opens its doors to natural gas development:

Members from several anti-drilling organizations are calling on the State Senate to fund a study of the potential health impacts of hydrofracking. The rally took place outside Libous’ office in Binghamton. Similar demonstrations took place outside the offices of other State Senators across New York.  The residents suggest an independent study be conducted outside of the government in order to ensure no conflict of interest. Considering the chemicals used in the drilling process, protesters argue that hydrofracking cannot be practiced safely until all health impacts are addressed. (YNN.com)

Does New York State really need a health impact study, or is this just another delay tactic?  Well, given the evidence, the answer is pretty clear – it’s all about the delay.

Let’s, for instance, take a look at a study done in Dish, Texas by that state’s Department of State Health Services.

In response to community concerns about potential health effects of natural gas drilling, DSHS collected biological samples from 28 Dish residents in late January to determine whether the levels of Volatile Organic Compounds, or VOCs, in their blood were higher than those measured in the broader population.

“In Dish, we found no pattern to our test results indicating community-wide exposure to any of these contaminants,” said Dr. Carrie Bradford, the DSHS toxicologist who led the investigation. “We were looking to see whether a single contaminant or a handful of contaminants were notably elevated in many or all of the people we tested. We didn’t find that pattern in Dish.”

Although a number of VOCs were detected in blood from some of the participants, the pattern of detection is consistent with exposures to consumer products (e.g., cigarette smoke and home maintenance products). Three of the compounds found in a few of the participants were disinfectant by-products associated with chlorinated drinking water systems. All of these participants obtained their drinking water from the same public drinking water system which uses chlorine as a disinfectant to remove harmful infectious agents. Additional information on disinfectant by-products is presented with the tap water results.

Texans are likely experiencing better health now, following natural gas development, because they can now afford health care and one of the most important contributors to good health is economic opportunity. With more people moving into the area, doctors are also now able to justify staying in the area.

“Biological test results from a Texas Department of State Health Services investigation in Dish, Texas, indicate that residents’ exposure to certain contaminants was not greater than that of the general U.S. population.” (DSHS report, May 12, 2010).

They would go on to mention that, “DSHS paid particular attention to benzene because of its association with natural gas wells. The only residents who had higher levels of benzene in their blood were smokers. Because cigarette smoke contains benzene, finding it in smokers’ blood is not unusual.”

Take a look at these two maps.  The one on the left illustrates the location of the Barnett Shale.  The one on the right rates health outcomes based on a study by the University of Wisconsin, the lighter colored counties being the healthiest.  Notice anything?  I thought you might.  I’d say these maps pretty much tell the story.  New York doesn’t need another study and more delay – it needs to get on with natural gas development.

Barnett Shale vs. Health Outcomes

Spoiler Alert!

Obviously, our obsessed friends aren’t yet ready to surrender.  The hare thought he was winning until the end, too.   The next targets of the anti-development crowd are Majority Leader Dean Skelos, Senator John Bonacic, Senator James Seward, Senator John DeFrancisco and the New York State Department of Health. The group will continue to push the idea of a health impact study based on nothing but pure hysteria and the speculation that virtually defines them.  Pardon me, if I’m skeptical.  The evidence of health issues with natural gas development isn’t just poor – it’s non-existent.  It looks to me like this is another case of natural born protestors seeking a cause.  If you asked me I’d say they ought to concentrate on getting healthy themselves.  Natural gas is good for our health and obsession with fighting it is just plain unhealthy.

 

20 Comments
  • Getthefacts
    Posted at 16:15h, 03 June Reply

    http://shaleshockmedia.org/2012/05/26/plymouth-town-hall-meeting-public-comments/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IJLap329q18&feature=endscreen&NR=1

    http://7191898.yourbodyiswater.info/

    These litigants should have been tossed out of the meeting in Plymouth for foul mouth comments. If they are going to make statements like that maybe they should look in a mirror or maybe they own funhouse mirrors.

    This video shows what it is all about money and attention. Now, they have friends and get to go out to dinner and are the center of it all.

    If this magic water is so magical why don’t all the litigants take the escrow money and buy a system then their water will all be fixed. Supposedly the water will do wonderful things for them too.

  • susan dorsey
    Posted at 18:51h, 03 June Reply

    you know your neighbor is a smoker

    • Savetheearth
      Posted at 09:57h, 06 July Reply

      What’s your point? His smoking hurts HIM (and the laws of the land have made sure he cant smoke in public areas). Fracking has hurt many, many people. And the potential still stands. Nothing the industry has done to make things safer has been terribly successful.

      Once again, the only ones truly on board with this disgusting method of gas extraction are those (like the little Colley girl), who are on EID’s payroll, or who stand to make big money by leasing.

      If this goes forward and it comes back to kick you in the arse, what are YOU gonna do….Sue them, I’ll bet!

      • Tom Shepstone
        Posted at 10:16h, 06 July Reply

        Hydraulic fracturing has hurt no one and if you did the research and stop using the term “fracking” to represent everything you don’t like you might just pick up on that.

        • Savetheearth
          Posted at 10:11h, 11 July Reply

          Tom, I have done tons of research and the fact remains…it is still full of fault which cause leaks, contamination and illness. All over the country…if not the world.

          The term “fracking” has become a very common shortening for the work hydrofracturing. What is your issue with THAT? Many people call a refridgerator “the fridge”. It is as simple as that…although I have heard reference from one of you cronies that we say that to make it appear more vulgar. Um…it IS vulgar, but that has nothing to do with anything. Leave it to a gasser to search long and hard for a negative comment for every little thing.

          The bottom line is this. Powers outside ourselves (well, outside of MY power. You guys feed money to the politicians, so you have more in your favor) will decide whether drilling goes forth. If it doesn’t…we all WIN! If it does, YOU WIN (for a while) but ultimately, we all lose.

          Down the pike, there will be destruction, rusty, abandoned wells leaking nasty stuff, an ugly landscape and a whole lot of ill communities. Better get some Ambien. You just might find it hard to sleep at night if your ideas of safe, responsible drilling prove to be impossible.

          Nighty night, Tom!

          • Tom Shepstone
            Posted at 16:42h, 11 July

            Such a brilliant fact-filled reply. You won’t win any arguments with this.

  • Fox Watch
    Posted at 20:28h, 03 June Reply

    It’s all a show, even to the point where Julie Saunter turned in the video to calm me a fat … and accusing me of laughing at their situation. I was manning a camera and have the tape of that meeting that picked up their conversation at the front of the room but nothing from me at the camera. Vera tries to justify Julie’s outburst by saying the sound didn’t pick up everything but it did and it did not pick me up uttering one word.

    • Savetheearth
      Posted at 10:02h, 06 July Reply

      I was there too…she may have been inappropriate, you were FIRST, VF!! You DID chuckle when she said her daughter had gotten sick while showering.

      How about we all play nice and NOT make disparaging comments about individuals? Keep it about the issue.

      You guys seem to think it is safe, others KNOW it is not. And Julie and Craig are not the only ones to have suffered as a result. YOU HAVE TO KNOW THAT….it is happening all across the country.

      • Tom Shepstone
        Posted at 10:17h, 06 July Reply

        The Sautner’s are their own worst enemy as our Sautnergate post indicated.

        • Savetheearth
          Posted at 10:15h, 11 July Reply

          All they want is what they had before the drilling began. You guys insist drilling had nothing to do with it. How can you say that? It wasnt that way. Drilling began. It was there. Duh!

          They are not the only parties to suffer at the hands of Cabot’s drilling. Quit turning a blind eye. It will all come out one day. In fact, it is all on the horizon.

          • Tom Shepstone
            Posted at 16:42h, 11 July

            Still more brilliance.

  • Bill desRosiers
    Posted at 09:56h, 04 June Reply

    The city of Fort Worth, Texas, completed a $1 Million independent study which said no adverse health impacts from natural gas development. Why does NY have to reinvent the wheel? Maybe to stall development but in the end the same results will come out. Responsible natural gas development is safe!

    http://www.star-telegram.com/2011/07/14/3221392/fort-worth-air-quality-study-finds.html

    • Savetheearth
      Posted at 10:18h, 11 July Reply

      The operative word being “responsible”. Havent seen much of that yet. I do hope, if it goes through, and it does look like it will…what with all the politicians in bed with O&G, that they DO take their time, do things right, not cut corners, hire responsible drivers, workers etc so that you guys can prove us wrong. I would much rather that happen than see it go forth and create a mess.

      • Tom Shepstone
        Posted at 16:43h, 11 July Reply

        Assertions, assertions, assertions – never an ounce of proof. Never A fact.

  • Bill Ferullo
    Posted at 19:26h, 06 June Reply

    There are a lot more than 30 people that oppose fracking ,and their protest haven’t come to an end like you would want ,sorry !

    • Tom Shepstone
      Posted at 22:11h, 06 June Reply
      • Savetheearth
        Posted at 10:03h, 06 July Reply

        Some people have jobs, Tom! Real jobs that keep them busy from morning til evening, The protests are usually during the day. Duh!

        • Tom Shepstone
          Posted at 10:18h, 06 July Reply

          Seems like that is the excuse everyone uses.

          • Savetheearth
            Posted at 10:21h, 11 July

            Are y0u that unsure of your stand that you have to make snarky contentless comments, Tom. Come on….either say something worthwhile or move on.

            Having to have the last snarky word is kind of adolescent…and beneath you.

          • Tom Shepstone
            Posted at 16:45h, 11 July

            We employ facts and all I have gotten from your 4 comments today is pointless unsubstantiated assertions.

Post A Comment