Dimock – What I Learned on Carter Road
As my first week with Energy in Depth comes to a wrap, all I can say is “Wow.” I have learned many facts about the industry, had the pleasure of visiting a natural gas production site and Dimock’s “Ground Zero” on Carter Road. It was a whirlwind week and has only helped to further enhance my excitement to work on the EID Marcellus team.
One thing is certain–until people get out and see these sites for themselves they will never understand the complexity of a natural gas operation. That much is clear as I begin to wrap my head around natural gas exploration. This topic, and hydraulic fracturing in particular, leave many people with a bad taste in their mouth because of the controversy. Most of us tend to avoid arguments in which we we don’t have a stake.
I can admit, living out of the Marcellus region, I was skeptical at first, too, because there is just so much misinformation circulating in the media. I’ve done my research, seen the operations first hand and can confidently say when I talk about it now, I am not left with that same bad taste. In fact, I feel a great deal of pride in my country for being able to explore and harvest such a great natural resource on our own soil. I am hoping I can soon have that same pride for my home state of New York.
The way natural gas production is portrayed in some media and by certain families in the public is simply not correct. Many think that production sites are very hazardous conditions for people in and around the site. Upon visiting a working site it is immediately noticed that this is not the case. Operations are highly technical, are methodically regulated, and overseen with the utmost care and attention to detail to ensure the operations are conducted safely.
As I continued my journey from rig to rig, I had the opportunity to see where many natural gas pipelines have been laid. Not that I could actually see any pipeline, but my tour guide pointed out the exact location one ran through a farm. The only thing I saw was just that, a farm.

Find the pipeline!
Carter Road “Ground Zero”
As we arrived at Carter Road I had an excited feeling. This is it. I finally get to see what all the hype has been about, i told myself. I prepared for the worst because, where I’m from Dimock and the term “wasteland” tend to be synonymous. While I knew much of what I had read in the news had already been refuted by science and water testing, I think I still expected to see some hint of truth on that famous stretch of road. I was happy to learn there was none.
As I passed the Sautner’s house all I could see were dozens of anti natural gas signs, dirty looks shot my way and reporters. This was the only hint of discontent; the only marring of a sleepy road that has been given an undo spotlight by the world.
One of these signs (see below) especially caught my eye. It was a “For Sale” sign on the Sautner property in the amount of $5,000,000! I’ve heard stories of price gouging in the media, but that about takes the cake. This family has already been offered twice the value of their home, and yet they have continuously asked for money over clean water. That sign was a real eye opener to what is really going on in an otherwise quiet town. It was obviously intended as some form of sarcasm, but it still provides insight into what this ongoing discussion is all about.

Sautner's $5,000,000 "For Sale" Sign Facing Their Neighbors
We passed the Sautner’s house and pulled into their neighbors’ who live not more then a few hundred feet from the house with “bad drinking water.” It was here that I met one of the nicest and kind spirited people I have ever met. She didn’t give me any dirty looks, instead, offered me something to eat and the opportunity to hear the side of the story the media doesn’t seem interested in covering. She was in Gasland, by the way, and is none too happy with Josh Fox.
After leaving the neighbors house, we drove less then half a mile down the road where I saw a well pad owned by another natural gas production company in the area. This is where I became confused about the entire situation.
It is common knowledge Cabot Oil and Gas has stopped production in a nine square mile zone around the “affected wells” until the Department of Environmental Protection approves them to resume operations in the zone. Yet, here were other companies developing in the same area. It just didn’t make sense.
The dozen or more signs on the front yard of the Saunter’s read “Stop Fracking” and “Stop Natural Gas Production.” But, if their water was truly contaminated because of hydraulic fracturing and natural gas production wouldn’t you want all natural gas production stopped in the area instead of just suing Cabot Oil and Gas for an absurd amount of money?
Out of all the coast to coast media attention that has been brought to this area including the “documentary” Gasland, the only video that I have seen portraying Dimock with any semblance of truth, has been a video by Dimock Proud.
I am excited to continue to dispel the myths portrayed in the media about Dimock and other aspects of natural gas exploration. If this first week is any indicator, I’ll have my hands full, but the truth is something that needs to be heard and I’m excited for the challenge.
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter!
thomas mckenzie
Posted at 07:15h, 27 MaySon, you need to keep living and hope and pray you never have something you work so hard for taken from you. That is what hapens when you have a home that has water contaminated by oil and gas development. Have you actually read thoe Dimock water test results? Regardless of what the EPA says, that water is not safe to drink. Common sense should tell you that.
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 10:22h, 27 May“Regardless of what the EPA says, that water is not safe to drink. Common sense should tell you that.”
Read that to yourself a few times, please.
thomas mckenzie
Posted at 10:26h, 27 Mayand your point is, sir?
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 17:39h, 27 MayIf you have to ask …
thomas mckenzie
Posted at 18:19h, 27 MayExplain what you mean. You will not hurt my feelings one bit. Evidently, and I hope I am wrong, you trust the EPA to tell you if your water is safe to drink or not. I do not trust government to tell me what is safe or not. There are more chemicals present in the samples I saw the results of than should be present anywhere in water that should be used for drinking purposes. Where do you propose the stuff came from if it did not come from gas drilling?
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 19:05h, 27 MayTom,
It is not “common sense” to ignore both DEP and EPA in their conclusions based on hundreds and hundreds of water tests that confirm what Cabot has found. What other sources would possibly rely upon? The water tests of litigants hoping to cash in on a big settlement? Where are the facts to counter DEP/EPA? We know everything found in the water either occurs naturally or can be attributed to other non-gas sources and the data shows all these are below the maximimums set by EPA. Where are we going here if we don’t use facts. Would you want your neighbor to be able to sue on the basis of “common sense” and speculation or would you insist the they supply evidence? The answer is obvious.
Vic
Posted at 22:02h, 27 MayTom Don’t try talking sense to the sensless… Remember what Pat Roberts of VeRSE said to me in Vestal.. “we are set in our beliefs and all the science in the world won’t change that”
thomas mckenzie
Posted at 15:23h, 28 MayI am going to quit trying. I had my water contaminated in Alabama the same way they did in Dimock, and the same crap happened. The water smelled like gasoline and the government said it was OK to drink. Fish would not even live 12 hours in it. What has happened is the industry has bought the government. I am all for developing gas resources on your own land. But keep the crap caused by it to yourself. If you cannot keep it contained, which is impossible, then do not do it. If you want to contaminate your own self, then fine, it is no business of mine. But when you start effecting me, then that is a different story.
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 19:41h, 28 MayHey, Tom, thanks for the explanation. I understand your perspective but we have stacks of paper from different testing agencies saying there is no contamination. We’ll just have to agree to disagree. Thanks for the candid views (seriously).
PG PG
Posted at 08:14h, 01 June(This family has already been offered twice the value of their home.) They were offered twice the tax-assessed value of each home, which is crap.
How can it be a coincidence that all these people have water problems now that is occurring naturally??
Why don’t all the people that don’t agree with these families load up on their water, take it home to your families. Drink it, use it for 6 months. We never hear of any volunteers.
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 11:14h, 01 JuneWe drank the water from consent order homes – before treatment – and we are on film doing it. See http://eidmarcellus.org/blog/i-know-contamination-and-theres-none-in-dimock/2890/. You ignore that and all the evidence from multiple agencies that contradicts your view. See John’s latest post for even more evidence:
http://eidmarcellus.org/blog/a-watershed-moment-in-bradford-county/9468/
Scott Cannon
Posted at 17:44h, 01 JuneI have a question regarding a “myth” of the gas industry. Enough is Enough/Dimock Proud has been saying they don’t take any money or help from the gas industry including Energy in Depth. My question is, “Who paid for this video, who paid for the yard signs, and who paid for the $375 a month web banner ads on a pro drilling site”? You are quick to call everyone else a liar, yet no one will answer this question, and prove it. Show me the receipts.
JD Krohn
Posted at 16:08h, 04 JuneSure thing Scott. Just like you never met Ms. Roos before your video. As per your request, we can’t give you receipts for something we didn’t pay for.
Scott Cannon
Posted at 14:25h, 05 JuneHonestly John, I did not meet, nor have even heard about Susan. What I explained in the video is the truth. I don’t get paid or make money to do this, so I have no reason to lie. You still didn’t answer the question. Who did?
JD Krohn
Posted at 08:27h, 06 JuneOK Scott, will take you at your word. That said, what was in that video was anything but the truth. It was more like a collection of accusations that have yet to be supported by any independent facts or data. Perhaps that’s why the litigants are losing the battle with EPA, DEP, the courts and everywhere else. As far as your continued question, I already answered your previous accusations.
Ashley
Posted at 21:00h, 04 JuneIt is sad to see how many people blindly follow the media and government agencies. The government is supporting the gas industry in Pennsylvania because they have stocks in those companies. So many people in our region trust the test results claims made from government officials, yet when someone can put a lighter to the water coming from their faucet and catch fire to the chemicals mixed in with the “safe water,” everyone turns a blind eye.
I used to take pride in the beauty of our region and the way in which so many of us took care of the land we live on – especially in an area where our resources are so important. To see so many people blinded by greed and paid-for promotions for this industry (take it from a professional in the field – these stories are written by people who are making a profit), is disheartening.
Open your eyes – These wells you see popping up all over our beautiful mountains may be profitable now, but what will happen to our land and your money once the area has been drained?
Tom Shepstone
Posted at 22:07h, 04 JuneSo, everyone who wants to be able to pat their taxes and keep the farm is greedy. I see. You think the money required to sustain the beautiful landscape you love grows on trees. There is no greed, of course, in wanting someone else to pay for your view though, right?
By the way, those flaming faucets? They’ve been around a long time. The fact you think they’re a result of natural gas development suggests you need to gather some facts before you start accusing others.
JD Krohn
Posted at 08:09h, 05 JuneThis is a conspiracy theory unrivaled by any other.